Anime Vanguards · Rankings

Anime Vanguards tier list

There is no official answer to this query. Kitawari publishes no official strength table, clear rate or tier list. Every placement below is a writer's opinion, attributed to its author. Searching the game's name returns dozens of pages, but only 2 original rankings can be lined up unit by unit — two more are listed below that we found and could not align — and the diffable pair disagrees on 69% of the units they share. Below is each source's placement, unaveraged, with the update it was written for.

Updated Nov 202616 units in both listsLists built for 11.5 and 14.5 claimedLive build: Update 15.5, branded "Trail of the Saint"

Units both lists rank SS

The only overlap at the top

Units 3+ tiers apart

Including Ice Queen (Release) at B vs SS

31%

Exact agreement rate

Across 16 units covered by both lists

Every unit both lists rank

Both placements per unit, oldest first. No averaging, no combined score.

All 16Conflicts onlyAgreements only

Read each row as two quotes: games.gg (11.5, 2026-03-24) and Beebom (14.5 claimed, 2026-09-26).

Ice Queen (Release)
Bgames.ggSSBeebom4 tiers ↑
Four-tier promotion, the largest movement in the sample.
Warlord (Of the Sea)
SSgames.ggBBeebom4 tiers ↓
Four-tier demotion. Listed in Beebom's collapsed B tier, which may be truncation rather than assessment.
Okorun (Turbo)
Cgames.ggSBeebom3 tiers ↑
Four-tier promotion.
Yehowach (Almighty)
SSgames.ggABeebom3 tiers ↓
Largest downgrade between the two lists.
Alocard (Vampire King)
Sgames.ggSSBeebom2 tiers ↑
Alocard was promoted from Secret to Vanguard rarity in Update 11.0, before either list was written.
Savior (Moonless)
SSgames.ggSBeebom2 tiers ↓
Teacher (Final Stand)
Agames.ggS+Beebom2 tiers ↑
Three-tier promotion.
Brolzi Super (Wrathful)
SSgames.ggS+Beebom1 tier ↓
Demon Hybrid (Chainsaw)
SSgames.ggS+Beebom1 tier ↓
Diablo (Renacimiento)
Sgames.ggS+Beebom1 tier ↑
Beebom also carries a "Diavolo" row at SS; the two may be the same unit under different spellings. We did not merge them.
Divalo (Requiem)
Sgames.ggS+Beebom1 tier ↑
Demon Leader (Control)
SSgames.ggSSBeebomsame tier
Gazelle (Zombie)
Dgames.ggDBeebomsame tier
Gujo (Infinity)
SSgames.ggSSBeebomsame tier
Song Jinwu and Igros
SSgames.ggSSBeebomsame tier
Sukono
listed as “Rebel Fighter (Sukuna)” by Beebom
SSgames.ggSSBeebomsame tier
The alignment itself is an inference. Source A calls this unit Sukono; source B prints Rebel Fighter (Sukuna); source C lists a Rebel Fighter (Gauntlet), which its own write-up dates to Update 14.5 on 2026-08-10 as a Secret-rarity Floor 50 reward — a different unit under the same base name. We could not reach a roster that settles whether Sukono and Rebel Fighter (Sukuna) are one unit, so treat this row's agreement as provisional.

↑ means Beebom ranked the unit higher than games.gg did, three updates later. Both columns are quotes, not this site's ranking.

games.gg

community hub · 200+ units · published 2026-03-24

Written for: Update 11.5 Moonless Sky
Scheme: God / SS / S / A / B / C / D
In the comparison: Yes — every unit both lists cover is rowed above
Stated method: Stated basis: base damage, utility, scaling and synergy across Infinite, Boss Rush and story modes. Rankings for units new in 11.5 are marked preliminary by the author.
Access note: The English games.gg page returned 404 to us; placements were read from this dated mirror of the same list.

Read games.gg

Beebom

guide site · ~100 units · published 2026-09-26

Written for: claims Update 14.5, body text still says "the game's latest update 12"
Scheme: SS / S+ / S / A / B / C / D
In the comparison: Yes — every unit both lists cover is rowed above
Stated method: No methodology stated beyond editorial picks. Units below A are collapsed into a handful of names, so the bottom of this list is truncation, not assessment.

Read Beebom

timesaver.gg

guide site · 8 units, explicitly · published 2026-10-19

Written for: dated 2026-10-19, written after Update 15.0
Scheme: no tiers — a ranked Top 8 plus best-DPS and best-team ordering
In the comparison: No — recorded as an original list we found but could not align row by row
Stated method: Names a Top 8 and ranks pure DPS separately, and states where each unit came from by update. It is not a tier table, so it cannot be diffed row by row against A and B — but it is original, and it is the only list found that cites a patch for each unit.
Access note: Fetched 2026-11-13.

Read timesaver.gg

bloxodes

guide site · unknown · published 2026-10-26

Written for: "After Update 15", dated 2026-10-26
Scheme: not readable from the fetched HTML
In the comparison: No — recorded as an original list we found but could not align row by row
Stated method: Unread at the time of writing, so it is listed for completeness and excluded from every comparison on the page.
Access note: Fetched 2026-11-13. We could not extract its tier table from the page source, so it is recorded as found rather than used.

Read bloxodes

Lists we did not count

Counting near-duplicates as independent votes is how most "aggregated" tier lists get confident-looking nonsense. Two clusters were rejected outright:

allthings.how — Its SS, S+, S, A, B, C and D entries are the same names in the same order as Beebom's, including Beebom's odd tail rows. Counted as a copy, not a second opinion. example
sohu / 9game / 233leyuan mirrors — Machine translations of the games.gg list stamped "来源：互联网" (source: internet) with no author. Same list, different alphabet.

What this page cannot tell you

Two wikis are reachable now — vanguards.wiki and vanguards.gg both returned HTTP 200 on 2026-11-13 — which contradicts what this page said when it was written. Neither exposes a readable roster in its HTML: the tier-list page carries only a partial list under its own headings, and the changelog body is a JavaScript shell. There is still no canonical name list to reconcile against, so names here remain exactly as the source that ranked them printed them. That rules out the two things a codex page would normally add — a full roster with rarities, and a release timeline showing when each unit landed — so this comparison is limited to the 16 units the two surviving lists have in common.

Update 15.5, branded "Trail of the Saint", is dated 2026-11-08 on the changelog's own heading — the newest numbered build label we could read. Update 14.5, branded "25th Hour", shipped 2026-08-10. Until a numbered label for the live build is confirmed, the title of this page carries no version string, and the update each source answered is stated per column instead.

Open items are tracked in the dataset itself, on the data sources page.

Questions

Does Roblox publish an official Anime Vanguards tier list?: No. Kitawari ships no strength table, clear rate or rarity ranking for Anime Vanguards, so every tier list for the game is editorial opinion. This page reports whose opinion, written for which update.
Why do the tier lists disagree so much?: Two reasons, and they compound. The lists were written for different builds — Update 11.5 Moonless Sky versus claims Update 14.5, body text still says "the game's latest update 12" — so three updates of balance changes sit between them. And Beebom's list only resolves the bottom of its own ranking to a handful of names, which reads as truncation rather than assessment.
Which units do both lists actually agree on?: Demon Leader (Control), Gujo (Infinity), Song Jinwu and Igros, Sukono. That is the closest thing to a consensus pick available: 4 of 16 units carry the same placement in both rankings. 1 of those 4 come with a caveat about whether the two sources are even naming the same unit, so read them as agreement plus an alignment assumption.
Why is this page not just one tier list?: Because the searchable tier lists for this game are not independent. One sohu / 9game / 233leyuan mirrors cluster is a machine translation of games.gg's list, and allthings.how reproduces Beebom's ordering entry for entry. Averaging copies would give false precision, so only the original lists are shown.
Are there more than two original tier lists?: Yes, and this page used to claim otherwise. timesaver.gg (2026-10-19) and bloxodes (2026-10-26) are both original. Neither is diffed above: timesaver.gg publishes a ranked Top 8 rather than a tier table, and we could not read bloxodes's table out of its page source at all. They are recorded here so the count of independent opinions is honest, not because they participate in the comparison.
Which update is the live build, and does it change these rankings?: The newest numbered label we could read is Update 15.5, branded "Trail of the Saint" and dated 2026-11-08, and it is newer than every list on this page. The changelog page fetched 2026-11-13 returns its body as a JavaScript shell; only the heading and date were readable from the HTML, so the contents of 15.5 are unverified. Treat that gap as the main reason no single column here should be followed as current.
Can unit names be trusted across the lists?: Two wikis are reachable now — vanguards.wiki and vanguards.gg both returned HTTP 200 on 2026-11-13 — which contradicts what this page said when it was written. Neither exposes a readable roster in its HTML: the tier-list page carries only a partial list under its own headings, and the changelog body is a JavaScript shell. There is still no canonical name list to reconcile against, so names here remain exactly as the source that ranked them printed them.

Method behind the Fortnite pages: locker valueand chest odds. Back to loadoutdex.